Posts Tagged ‘Spending Map’

What Can Brown Do For You, Massachusetts?

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

Scott Brown made history on Tuesday, becoming the first Republican to win a Massachusetts Senate seat in over thirty years. Brown won 52% of the vote, beating his opponent Martha Coakley by a margin of five percent. He gained the winning majority of the vote in 65% of the Commonwealth’s 351 precincts.

This television market map shows Brown’s margin of victory by county:
ma-dma-with-margin-of-victory

Martha Coakley spent $628,000 on broadcast and cable during the Democratic primary from 11/13-12/8. At that time, Coakley was ahead of Brown in the polls by 15%-30%. Brown first placed advertising the week of 12/30, spending $380,000 on broadcast and cable, airing positive ads such as “JFK”, “Hey, Dad”, and “Response”. For the last two weeks leading up until the election, Brown spent a total of $2.7 million, gaining an even position with Coakley in the polls. Coakley responded with negative ads on 1/7, and placed $2.1 million for the last two weeks of the election. While these negative response ads were airing, Brown skyrocketed ahead in the polls as far as a nine point lead two days before the election.

Both candidates spent the bulk of their dollars in the Boston market, each placing around $2.4 million.

This map shows Coakley’s spending by television market: ma-dma-with-coakley-spending

This map shows Brown’s spending by television market: ma-dma-with-brown-spending

This chart shows each candidate’s spending by week: Massachusetts Broadcast and Cable Spending

Several issue groups also placed advertising in Boston regarding this special election, including American Future Fund, Americans For Responsible Healthcare, Chamber of Commerce, Citizens for Strength & Security, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, Employment Policies Institute, League of American Voters, League of Conservation Voters, National Republican Trust PAC, SEIU, Tea Party Express.

Unofficial election results from www.boston.com
Polling data from www.politico.com

McAuliffe Proves Money Isn’t Everything

Friday, June 26th, 2009

Terry McAuliffe placed a total of $2.1 million on broadcast, cable, and radio advertising in the Virginia democratic primary, outspending his opponent Creigh Deeds 2 to 1 and proving that money couldn’t disguise his Syracuse accent in the Old Dominion.

McAuliffe was up on broadcast and cable for five months in Norfolk, Richmond, and Roanoke, but he spent 50% of his overall budget in one week when he entered into all markets in Virginia from 6/1-6/9, placing a total $1.1 million in advertising.

Creigh Deeds spent a total of $1.1 million on broadcast, cable and radio advertising for the entire election. Instead of running ads for several months like his opponent did, Deeds only went up on air during the last five weeks leading up until the primary. Like McAuliffe, Deeds spent 50% of his total budget for broadcast and cable for the week of 6/1-6/9, placing $502k in all markets across the state.

McAuliffe spent 28% of his overall budget in the inefficient Washington, DC market, spending more than three times as much there than Deeds did. He placed nearly $600k in broadcast and cable during the last week, while Deeds placed $162k. Despite this spending advantage, Deeds won the market by a moderate margin.

Spending and Voting Comparison