Archive for July, 2010

She’s Got a Handel On Price

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

Last night Georgia Republicans took the first step towards deciding who would be their Republican nominee for governor. In a field of four major candidates, more than $3.05 million was spent and 679,572 ballots were cast making the statewide average cost per vote $4.49. If we look at the cost per vote (CPV) of the individual candidates, we find that Karen Handel was unquestionably the most effective candidate in the race.

Handle’s CPV was $0.65 – a feat of efficiency when compared to the other candidates. The runner-up, Congressman Nathan Deal, paid $2.37 per vote, or 3.6 times what Handel paid. Moving down the list of candidates, third-place finisher, former State Senator Eric Johnson, paid $8.85 per vote. That’s 13.65 times what Handel paid and 197% more than the statewide average. Finally, fourth-place finisher and current statewide office holder John Oxendine paid a shocking $11.86 per vote, or almost 18 times what Karen Handel paid. Oxendine’s CPV was 256% above the statewide average of $4.49.

The old rule of quality over quantity seems to hold true with Cost Per Vote. Beyond a kitschy phrase, however, lies the startling revelation that CPV stands out as an ominous predictor of candidate’s success.

It’s Better to Have Friends in High Places

Friday, July 16th, 2010

As we’ve watched this cycle boom and bust, incumbents have gone down or won by the skin of their teeth in both parties, and upset candidates have come out of nowhere.  In many of these cases its because of 3rd party actors.   In the case of recently nominated candidate Sharron Angle, 3rd party spending may have been the deciding factor.  In the week before the primary election on June 8th 3rd Party Actors (Tea Party Express, Our Country Deserves Better PAC, and Club for Growth) spent over $110k in Las Vegas and Reno Broadcast running ads touting Angle and disparaging her primary former Party Chairman Sue Lowden.  This $130k buy (plus her own $19k) allowed Sharron Angle to compete financially with her much better funded opponent Sue Lowden who was able to spend $97k in the final week of the election.

On the other hand if you have nothing but enemies, things can get pretty painful.   Just recently Inc. Sen. Blanche Lincoln was primaried by Lt. Gov. Bill Halter.  Lincoln had maintained a record that was deemed unacceptably pure by the National Democrat base.   As a result, this Arkansas Democrat was brutally attacked by outside interests including the Communications Workers of America, AFSCME, and Arkansans for Change.  These organizations expended over $897k in broadcast television alone in their war on Lincoln.   These attacks, plus the Halter campaign’s significant financial resources, forced the Lincoln campaign to spend over 85% of her campaign fund before she’s reached the general.  This spending had substantively negative impact on the Lincoln campaign.  Lincoln was barely re-elected in a run-off (receiving 52% of the vote).  As of the 5/18 FEC filing, Lincoln (the two-term incumbent) will be forced to enter the General Election in a situation of (roughly) financial parity with her opponent, Congressman John Boozeman.

As a result, we can see the importance of 3rd party spending and making sure that you have a little help from your friends………………